comments 56

In-Depth Guide to the NATE Cam E-Chrome Collection

Welcome to my in-depth guide to the Nate Cam E-Chrome Collection!

The E-Chrome Collection is my new pack of Lightroom presets, based on classic analog films. It goes beyond emulation to bring out incredible tones in your photos. If you want to learn more about what went into this pack and how photographers are using it to take their work to the next level, check out the E-Chrome Collection Launch Page.

My goal in this guide is simply to take you inside each of the presets and show you how to use this pack to dial in just the right tones in your photos.

Think of this as your field guide to the E-Chrome Collection.

Ready? Let’s jump in!

Preset Details
// Film Toolkit Details // Usage Notes // Purchase Information

Preset Details

EX01 // EX02 // EX03 // EX04 // EX05 // EX06 // EX07 // EX08 // EX09 // EX10

There are 10 main styles in the E-Chrome Collection, with 4 strengths each [standard, –, ––, +], for a total of 40 presets.

While they are all based in classic films, I’ve tried to include looks that will accommodate just about every situation, from weddings & portraits, to landscapes and street photography.

However, some presets definitely work best in certain situations, so I’ve tried to note that in the preset details below.

The strength settings simulate the effect of blending the preset effect with the original image. So for instance, the [–] setting simulates lowering the opacity of the effect to 75%. If you are use to the “strength slider” on VSCO cam, this will give you a similar effect.

Don’t be afraid to use the strength variations. The before and after photos below all use the standard strength just for illustration, but I typically prefer the [–] version.

Ok, let’s look at each of these presets.

EX01 – Super Clean, Ektachrome Tones

Overview: A lively, super-clean aesthetic. This preset was inspired by a set of Kodak Ektachrome film prints, but with (I think) improved skin tones (real Ektachrome has a tendency to produce overly-magenta skin tones).

Best for: This is a good preset for general use, but I particularly like it for softly-lit portraits, architecture, food photography, still-life and travel photography. If you find the full-strength version makes images a little too “hot” you can pull it back with the [–] and [––] versions.

Before & After:

Drag the slider to see before and after. In all of these examples, the only thing that has been changed in each image is the use of the NATE Cam preset (unless I’ve noted otherwise).

The EX01 preset really cleans this image up and gives it an added “crispness.” You can see in the before that the skin tones have an unpleasant magenta cast (which is a common issues with the Adobe Standard camera profile). The NATE Cam custom camera profile fixes this issue and is a key part to making this preset look so great.

This preset produces very clean tones. It adds a slight lushness to greens and warms the reds up a bit.  I’ve used the “Film Punch +” preset (from the Film Toolkit) just to make this feel a bit bolder.

EX02 – AGFA-esque, with warm reds

Overview: An Agfa-esque look with prominent red undertones. This is a very usable general preset. It produces beautiful, nostalgic tones with the smallest hint of cross-processing. Great for snapshots of all kinds.

Best for: Good general purpose consumer film-look, with warm skin tones. Looks great in sunlight or in shade. If you find that it gives your image an overly red cast, try using the [-] or [–] variation.

Before & After:

The EX02 preset has an AGFA-esque quality to it and is good for adding just a bit of consumer-film “pop” to everyday photos. It has really pleasing, warm undertones that work great in shadow or in shade.


EX03 – Perfect Portra

Overview:  This preset has beautiful, soft, organic feel that is similar to the effect of over-exposing Kodak Portra . Very natural skin tones with beautiful teal blues. Soft, faded shadows and highlights.

Best for: Weddings & Portrait Photography

Before & After photos:

This preset really works magic on skin tones, with a soft, pastel color palette. It’s also a great option for desaturated landscapes

EX04 – Impossibly Warm & Moody

Overview: This is probably my favorite preset in the pack. The color palette has a strong bias towards golden orange tones, but it does it in a way that is really smooth and natural. There’s also a good amount of fade here in both the shadows and highlights, which really enhances the moodiness of the photo.

Best for: This is a strong effect, but it can actually work well in a lot of situations. Use it on portraits when you want a “warm and dusty” look or on landscapes to create a deep, warm mood.

Before & After:

Super warm tones all the way from the shadows to the highlights. Notice how smooth the gradations are in the skin tones.

The EX04 preset really ties this shot together. It dramatically changes the feel of the scene, but still manages to seem natural and organic. I also used the “Film Punch +” filter from my Film Toolkit pack to give this photo even more drama.

EX05 – Kodak Maximus, Super Lush

Overview: This preset adds a gorgeous, lush style that’s reminiscent of Kodak’s consumer film. It has an exaggerated amount of “punch,” with dramatic, deep shadows, extra cool green tones, and balanced skin tones.

Best for: I like to use this to give photos a “dramatic fashion photography” feel. This preset can be strong, so be sure to try the [–] version.

Before & After:

Look at how much drama the EX05 preset adds to this photo. The skin tones stay perfect as the rest of the scene changes pretty dramatically to compliment the skin – with deep, detailed shadows, super lush greens, and turquoise blues.

EX06 – Fuji tones, pro-grade

Overview: My take on Fuji professional portrait films, like 400h. Soft, warm skin tones with the perfect amount of green tinting in the shadows. This is also a popular look for fashion photography and wedding photography.

Best for: Fashion Photography, Wedding Photography

Before & After:

With the right light, this preset is pure magic! I’ve also added my “400ISO” grain filter from the Film Toolkit just to give this a more film-like look, and some pleasant depth.

EX07 – Extra Golden Kodak

Overview:  Gorgeous warm glow with lots of punch. This is what Kodak Gold should look like.

Best for: Perfect for adding drama to cityscapes, especially on sun-drenched morning or afternoon shots.

Before & After:

I took the shot above from a cruise ship as we were approaching Ephesus, Turkey. It didn’t really “feel” right until I used the EX07 preset. The preset really gives it that sun-drenched, arid, 110-degrees-in-the-shade feeling I was trying to capture.

I love the warmth and punch that the EX07 preset added to this shot. It really brings shots like this to life.

EX08 – Moody Fuji Superia

Overview: Cool tones with a super moody vibe. This is my new “go-to” for street photography. Add a touch of grain from the NATE Cam Film Toolset, and you’re in business.

Best for: Perfect for moody, overcast city shots and landscapes.

Before & After:

This EX08 filter adds great moodiness to city and landscape shots, particularly in soft, overcast lighting.

EX09 – Washed-Out Portra

Overview: Dreamy, washed-out tones with a noticeable tan-tint. Great for soft, muted landscapes.

Best for: Great for soft landscapes.

Before & After:

EX10 – Cross-Processed Fuji

Overview: This preset adds just the right amount of “moodiness” to a photo. It has a classic fuji-esqe color pallet with subtle cross-processing effect that gives images blue/teal shadows and yellow/rosy highlights. There is also subtle fade which adds to the moodiness.

Best for: Moody portraits, city shots, landscapes.

Before & After:

The EX10 preset adds warm highlights and cool turquoise shadows, which balance each other out well. There’s also a tiny bit of fade.

Film Toolkit Details

Film Dynamics // Film Fade // Film Punch // Film Saturation // Film Grain

A lot of other preset packs come with separate “toolkit” add-ons, but I always find two big problems with them:

First, other toolkits have presets that are probably easier to set directly. I saw one toolkit selling for $50 that had 10 presets just for setting the exposure. Seriously, how hard is it to change the exposure? Do we really need a preset for this?

Second, other toolkits were overwriting the settings in the original preset, leading to bad and unpredictable results.  When I hit the preset to “add fade” on other preset packs, it was just as likely to decrease the fade (because it is overwriting whatever fade was on the original preset). Same with the grain setting. It seems like whoever built the toolkit didn’t communicate with whoever built the preset.

So I built the NATE Cam Film Toolkit around two principles: 

  1. My Film Toolkit only includes settings you can’t quickly adjust yourself. 
  2. My Film Toolkit is designed to compliment the main presets I built. This means I have strategically used the settings available and purposely left settings untouched in the main preset so that the Film Toolkit will work on top of it.

Having the Film Toolkit has cut down on my development time dramatically and really improved the results I’m getting. In a couple of clicks, I can make the exact adjustments I want.

Let’s look at each of these settings and see what they are doing:

Film Dynamics // + // ++ // +++

These tools help to recapture the softness of film in a way that is natural and pleasing. You will find these tools useful if you find that the full-strength presets are a little “harsh” or “too contrasty” for your style, or you just want a more subtle analog film look.

Using Film Dynamics is different than using the [-] or [–] of a given preset. Using Film Dynamics, you keep the overall effect of the preset (i.e. hue shifts, tinting, etc) and only soften the dynamic range of the image. If you want to lower the overall effects of the preset (including color shifts, etc), you should start by trying the [-] and [–] versions.

Film Fade // 01 // 02 // 03 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10

Adding fade via an RGB curve is pretty easy. But doing it predictably is all but impossible, because those damn tiny points on the curve are so sensitive and difficult to control.

So this is simply a predictable, pre-built way for you to add very precise fade to your images.

And because my presets make their curve adjustments in the channel specific curves, the fade will truly be on top of the existing preset (and not messing up an existing curve).

Film Punch // + // ++ // +++

I use this one a lot.

This preset adds intensity to your photos by carefully pulling down the blacks and shadow tones without effecting skin tones.

Even though it’s simple, I think this is one of the most useful presets in the pack and I try each level of this preset as one of the final steps in my processing flow.

Film Saturation // – // + // ++ // +++

The Film Saturation presets solve a problem I’ve been working on for a long time: how to increase saturation levels just in the shadows and highlight areas of an image.

In Lightroom, there isn’t a direct setting to do this, but I’ve found a way that works really well (and it doesn’t involve the saturation settings at all). It basically “tricks” Lightroom into adding more saturation right where we want it.

You can also do the opposite of this and keep the mid-tones saturated, but de-saturate the highlights and shadows using the [-] version of this preset.

Grain [megapixels] // 200 // 400 // 800 // 1600

In Lightroom, the grain effect isn’t scaled for the resolution of your image.

Let’s say you have two images. One is 12 megapixels, the other is 20 megapixels. If you apply a grain with a size of “30” to both of those images, you will see large grain on the 12 megapixel image, and virtually no grain on the 20 megapixel. It makes a HUGE difference!

To solve this, I’ve calibrated the grain size and strength for three different megapixel ranges: 10-15MP, 15-20MP, 20-30MP.

So for instance, say you’re lucky enough to be shooting with a Nikon D5, and you want to replicate the approximate grain from a 400 ISO analog film. You would just select “Grain [20-30MP] – 400 ISO”. Or, if like me you are sadly still shooting with an older model that is just 12 megapixels, you would select “Grain [10-15MP] – 400 ISO.”

Usage Notes

Setup and Organization // NATE Cam Profiles // My Workflow

Setup & Organization

Getting started with the E-Chrome Collection is easy. You’ll get an email with more instructions and a video, but just in case you lose it, you can click here to watch a video on how to install E-Chrome. 

I’ve tried to organize the pack in a way that makes it very easy to use and to pick which preset you want to use.

There’s a preset description next to the main strength of each preset.


This serves two purposes. First, it means you don’t have to memorize what each preset does. Because it’s labeled right there next to the preset. And second, it makes it easy to see which preset is the standard strength. (Also, it just looks better.)

This solves a complaint I’ve heard a lot (and experienced) with VSCO Film. With VSCO Film you just have this massive wall of indistinguishable presets and its very difficult to know which one to use. Should you use the “Agfa RSX 50 II +” or the “Kodak Elite Chrome 160T Alt +“??? It just all starts to blend together, even for someone like me who has studied each of these films.

NATE Cam Profiles

The first time you use an E-Chrome preset on a RAW photo, it will automatically select the right NATE Cam Profile made for your camera model. You should see the Camera Calibration change to “NATE Cam.”


You don’t have to manually select the profile. Just choose a preset, and it will do this for you.

Even though it just says “NATE Cam”, the profile is specific to your camera model. This is kind of a peculiarity of the way that presets and camera calibration profiles work. The camera profile is smart enough to only be loaded for your specific model, even though internally they are all labeled as “NATE Cam” so that the preset can consistently select it.

If the profile is listed as “embedded,” you are not working on a RAW file. This means you are working on a JPEG or TIFF file. The NATE Cam presets will still work fine, you just won’t get the added benefit of the camera calibrations.

My Workflow

A lot of people have asked about my workflow using these presets, and how they should use them. Here’s roughly the flow I typically take.

  1. Exposure & White Balance – Get these close to “correct.” The exposure should be low enough to avoid highlight clipping. The white balance should be close to neutral, but don’t worry about getting it perfect. Your image should look unremarkable at this point.
  2. Apply the E-Chrome Preset – I usually have a good idea of which preset I want, but you may need to play around a bit at first. Imagine what you want. Read the preset descriptions. Start off with the regular strength.
  3. Adjust strength of preset – Depending on the scene and what you want your image to look like, you may want to dial down or dial up the effect using the strength variations.
  4. Fine Tune with NATE Cam Film Toolkit – I usually like adding a bit of punch. Depending on the image, I may also add a bit of fade and grain (by default, no grain is added in main preset).
  5. Re-adjust Exposure & White Balance if necessary.
  6. Make any other adjustments. 95% of the time, this should be all you need to do, but if it still isn’t the look you are going for, of course feel free to make additional edits! It’s beyond the scope of this post to talk about all the adjustments you could make, but if you have an idea, go for it! That’s how you learn!
  7. That’s it!

Purchase Info

If you haven’t purchased E-Chrome yet, there are a couple of different packages available right now.

Lightroom + ACR Presets
Presets for Lightroom + ACR
E-Chrome Presets for:
Lightroom 4,5, 6, CC
ACR (Photoshop)
+ Custom Camera Profiles
+ Film Toolkit Presets
+ Mac OSX Installer
+ Windows Instructions
Photo / Video bundle
3D LUT presets for Videographers
Everything from the base pack, plus:
3D-LUTs for video processing for use with
+ Adobe Premiere
+ Adobe After Effects
+ Final Cut Pro
+ Any video editor which accepts 3D LUTs

Guaranteed to be the Best Presets You Own

I know you are probably wondering, “Will E-Chrome really look this good on my photos?” Yes, it will. But just in case there is any doubt, go ahead and try it out. And if you don’t absolutely love it, just tell me and I’ll give you a 100% refund. No questions asked.

Hope that helps! And let me know if you have any questions or comments below.



    • Nathan Johnson

      The 3D LUTs were designed for Rec.709, but you could add an S-Log 2 -> Rec.709 lut in your workflow before the E-Chrome Luts. If there’s enough interest, I can also just make versions for S-Log 2.

  1. Lorena

    This is so amazing! Thank you so much for everything you’ve shared here. I found it extremely useful and enlightening.
    This might be a little off, but I actually decided I wanted to give all this a try since I realized I love the work of many photographers that use these presets and have an analogue approach, even when editing digital photography. I’m particularly obssesed with this photographer:
    Do you have any recommendations for me as in ‘…you definitely need to give these *** films a try’, or something? So I can try make my images have a similar look. Again, sorry if it’s way off.
    And congrats again! Seriously, fantastic work! 🙂

    • Nathan Johnson

      Hey! Thanks so much for your kind words and support 🙂
      Emari is amazing. Looking through her feed, there are a couple of things to keep in mind:

      • It’s clear from a editing standpoint that she is using a mix of styles (not just one preset). Nothing too extreme. For the look she has with warm faded highlights, I would try EX09 [-]. I would also try using EX01 & EX05 as a base for further edits
      • Based on the colors in her images, I can all but guarantee you she is shooting with Canon. The colors from Canon are amazing. I’m actually about to trade in my Nikon for a Canon 5D because the color reproduction is so much better than my Nikon. I’d also highly recommend the Fuji X-T2 that I just purchased for it’s color reproduction. Editing is so much easier when you’re starting off with better colors!
      • For me, what ties her images together stylistically are two things. First, she has very accurate white balance in all of her scenes. Use a grey card in every scene so you have a reference point for setting it later. Second, she has a lot of true black (areas so dark that there is no texture) and true white (areas so bright there no texture). Try increasing the exposure on your images tad until your skin tones are nice and bright, then pull down the “black” slider until the darks parts of the image are essentially black. That plus a little bit of selective fading and selective tinting should get you close.
      • The colors in E-Chrome are also a little more muted by design than Emari, but this can be easily adjusted. Just increase the “Blue Primary Saturation” (located in the Camera Calibration Panel) until colors are bold, but not overdone.
      • You may also find that the reds in E-Chrome are a touch warmer than what is in Emari’s images. You can also adjust this by moving the Red Primary Hue slider slightly to the left.
      • Hope that helps!

      • Lorena

        She is definitely amazing, I couldn’t agree more.
        And I just purchased a Canon 6D, and I bought Canon BECAUSE of the colors. So I totally get what you’re saying.
        I don’t have the E-Chrome pack (I actually wrote my comment here because it was the last post I read, from all those I read). However, I have the 07 pack, but was thinking about purchasing another that might help me get closer to my photography goals.
        I bought that one because of it’s subtle effects, but I don’t know. I probably am a little misguided.
        Which pack would you recommend for me, given this purpose?
        Thank you so much for eveything!


  2. Daniel

    Hi Nate, thanks for doing all this good stuff, you are doing a great job! Are the NATE Cam Profiles in the E-Pack also included for Fuji Cameras, like the X-T2?

    • Nathan Johnson

      YES – I love fuji cameras and support them with custom profiles (the X-T2 has actually been my go-to camera recently – so great!).

      Here’s the full list of custom camera profiles right now:

      There are a couple new models that I haven’t added yet, but will update support soon. If there’s a model you want that you don’t see on there, just let me know and I’ll add to the list 🙂

      • Mike

        Hi Nate – I have been thinking of purchasing this preset, but I noticed that the Fuji XH-1 isn’t on the list of supported cameras. Is there an update for this coming soon?


  3. Anastasia

    I just wanted to say thank you what you’ve already shared with us! Keep going and I’m looking forward to seeing more))
    You’re doing a great job indeed!

  4. Max

    Hey Nate,
    I like to buy your presets but in one point i struggle a Little bit. I use the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and this camera is not listed. Can I use the profile for the Mark I instead or will you provide the Mark II profile soon?
    Thank you 🙂

    • Nathan Johnson

      Hi Max,
      Good news! This package does include a profile for your Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II… The way that Lightroom names cameras internally, it has removed the “OM-D” for the title, so you will see in on the list as “Olympus E-M1 Mark II”. Hope that helps!

  5. Chris

    Hi Nate. Fantastic Presets! I’m owning a D850. Is this camera profile included in the presets? If not, do you update the profiles from time to time?

    Thanks in advance

    • Nate Johnson

      UPDATE: Nikon D850 profiles now included in latest version

      Hey! I do update the profiles and push through updates from time to time, but if you have an immediate need for a camera not on the list yet, I can send it to you (actually already have built a D850 profile for some other photographers, just haven’t packaged it yet, so just email me if you purchase!).

  6. Luke

    Hi Nate,
    I have purchased some times ago the E-Chrome presets and I am much, much more than happy.
    As of today April 4th 2018, Adobe has released an update to Lightroom that actually mess up badly with your presets and the order they appear in the folder is messed up so that they are no more logically catalogued i.e. Agfa-esque is not followed by its different intensities – then — and then +, but scattered around.
    Are you going to release an update to fix this or should we be waiting for Adobe to take care of it?
    Thanks for your feedback and of course for your awesome presets!

    • Nate Johnson

      UPDATE: This issue has been fully fixed as of E-Chrome 1.4

      Hi Luke,
      Yes, I’m aware of the issues caused when updating to Lightroom Classic 7.3. I am working on a fix that I hope to release later this week.

      7.3 is a major update from Adobe with some serious flaws. For the time being, I would recommend people stick to 7.2 if they can and maybe wait until 7.4 to update (once they’ve ironed out some of the issues). Basically, Adobe attempts to automatically “convert” existing presets to a new format (.xmp), but it can cause some issues (the order being one of them)

      Thanks Luke!

      • Hi Nate, are you any closer to fixing the issue. Just went to edit a shoot from this afternoon and discovered the update problem.

        I can use a VSCO preset for a workaround over the weekend but I am a massive fan of your presets.

        Very best wishes,

      • Nate Johnson

        UPDATE: Newest version of E-Chrome (1.4) is sorted correctly in Lightroom Classic 7.3. Also, I’ve been evaluating a pre-build of LR Classic 7.3.1 where the ordering issues caused by Adobe are (mostly) fixed

    • Nate Johnson

      Thanks so much Florian! YES! The new E-Chrome updates JUST went out to all current users (it may take a few minutes to reach your inbox). Will need to update the page but lots of good stuff including:

      – new camera profiles
      – updates for 7.3 to fix orderin
      – enhanced profiles in 7.3
      – LR Mobile presets

  7. Chang

    Hello Nate,

    Firstly I want to say that your presets are really great!
    I’ve been using them for a while and satisfied about it.

    In the latest info it says the LR Mobile Presets are coming.
    How can I use it and where can I find the PDF?
    (I cannot find the PDF in my mail)

    • Nate Johnson

      Hi Chang! Looks like I forgot to include the PDF! I’ll send out a new note (you can also check it out here: E-Chrome Installation Guide.PDF).

      I’m also making a longer post here on the site about creating and using preset settings in LR Mobile. It will go way more in depth than the installation guide does on the topic. So be looking for that soon!


  8. Luke

    Hi Nate, I have noticed that in the last few updates of LR, your presets are listed as “partially compatible” and its title is displayed in italics: is any update planned to fix this or being partially compatible does not affect the result?
    Would appreciate your feedback!
    Thanks and regards!

  9. Hi,
    I installed this into Lightroom CC and the tool kit is fine but the E-Chrome preset folder only says –RESET EX – and none of the presets show although I followed instructions carefully. Please let me know what I can do to remedy this.

    Thank you!

  10. Florence

    Hi Nate !

    I’ve just bought the E-Chrome preset. I followed the installation instructions ( for windows) carefully but the E presets don’t work. The names are gray instead of white in the list of presets. And when I try one, the profil change to NATE Cam but right below it says profil missing ..
    I’ve try with files from different cameras..
    The toolkit works fine.

    I really don’t know what to do..

    • Nate Johnson

      Hi, what camera are you using? Are you working with RAW files or with JPEGs? If the preset names are listed in grey, that means that the camera profile that it calls for is not available for your photo… this could either be because 1) you have a new camera model that I have not made a profile for yet, or 2) the camera profiles aren’t in the right place for Adobe to use them, or 3) you are working with a JPEG file.

Leave a Reply